Aristarchus
It’s funny, but not all of the scientists we talk about on this website are actually famous. Some of them, like Aristarchus, deserve to be… but they’re not.
If you’re looking for an unsung hero of science, you could do worse than Aristarchus of Samos, or Aristarchus the Mathematician as some people called him. Today, a better name might be Aristarchus, who discovered that Earth orbits the Sun.
Aristarchus was born in about the year 310 BC, probably on the Greek island of Samos, the same island that Pythagoras had been born on 260 years earlier. We know very little about Aristarchus’s life, but we know enough to be astounded by his science.
We know that Aristarchus lived at about the same time as two of our other scientific heroes, Archimedes and Eratosthenes, and that he was 20 to 30 years older than them. We know that his greatest work has been lost in the mists of time. We know a little about this work because Archimedes mentions it in a document called ‘The Sand Reckoner,’ more of which soon.
Advertisements
Copernicus says that Earth orbits the Sun
To appreciate what Aristarchus did over 2000 years ago, it’s worthwhile thinking about one of the greats of astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus.
In 1543 Nicolaus Copernicus published his famous book: On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. He told us that Earth, and all the other planets, orbit the sun. In other words, he said that the Solar System is heliocentric.
Until Copernicus published his work, people thought we lived in a geocentricSolar System – i.e. that Earth was at the center of everything. They believed that the moon, the planets, the sun and the stars all orbited the earth.
The geocentric idea was taught by the Catholic Church, and Copernicus was a member of that church. Copernicus’s book was suppressed by the church, but gradually, his theory came to be accepted.
In fact, however, Copernicus was rather late coming to the heliocentric view.
Aristarchus beat him by 18 centuries.
Archimedes tells us about Aristarchus’s Book
Sadly, the book Aristarchus wrote describing his heliocentric Solar System has been lost – the fate of many great Ancient Greek works. Fortunately, we know a little about it, because it is mentioned by other Greeks, including Archimedes, who mentions it in a letter he addressed to a King named Gelon. This letter was ‘The Sand Reckoner.’ Archimedes wrote:
“You know the universe is the name astronomers call the sphere whose radius is the straight line from the center of the earth to the center of the sun. But Aristarchus has written a book in which he says that the universe is many times bigger than we thought. He says that the stars and the sun don’t move, and that the earth revolves about the sun and that the path of the orbit is circular.”
Aristarchus must have used the concept of parallax to show that the stars are a very large distance from Earth. In doing so, he expanded the size of the universe enormously.
It would be marvelous if we could learn the details of Aristarchus’s observations, calculations, arguments, could read his notes and see his diagrams; but, unless a copy of his ancient book can be discovered in some forgotten, dusty corner of an ancient library, that is a pleasure we shall never have.
Aristarchus also believed that, in addition to orbiting the sun, Earth was spinning on its own axis, taking one day to complete one revolution.
Aristarchus Offends the ‘Pious’
Unfortunately, it seems that Aristarchus’s idea didn’t find many fans. In fact, echoing the persecution of Renaissance scientists, some Greeks wanted to put Aristarchus on trial for daring to say Earth was not at the center of the universe. Most Ancient Greeks rejected Aristarchus’s work, and continued to believe in a geocentric Solar System.
Thankfully, Archimedes was happy to use Aristarchus’s model of the universe inThe Sand Reckoner, to discuss calculations using larger numbers than the Greeks had used before.
Only one of Aristarchus’s works has survived, in which he tried to calculate the sizes of the moon & sun and tried to figure out how far they were from Earth. He already knew the sun was much larger than Earth by observing Earth’s shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse, and he also knew that the sun was much farther away from us than the moon.
Although the optical technology of his time didn’t allow Aristarchus to know the finer details of our Solar System, his deductions were absolutely correct based on what he could actually see. What he lacked in technology, he made up for in deductive genius.
What Aristarchus got Right
23 centuries ago, Aristarchus’s proposed, with evidence, that the earth and the planets orbit the sun. He further deduced that the stars are much farther away than anyone else had imagined, and hence that the universe is much bigger than previously imagined. These were major advances in human ideas about the universe.
What did Copernicus know about Aristarchus’s Work?
Copernicus actually acknowledged in the draft of his own book that Aristarchus might have said the earth moved around the sun. He removed this acknowledgement before he published his work.
In Copernicus’s defense, he was probably unaware of The Sand Reckoner by Archimedes, because, after its rediscovery in the Renaissance, The Sand Reckoner only seems to have existed as a few hand-written copies until it was finally printed in 1544. By then Copernicus had published his own book and had died. What he knew of Aristarchus probably came from the following very brief words written by Aetius:
“Aristarchus counts the sun among the fixed stars; he has the earth moving around the ecliptic [orbiting the sun] and therefore by its inclinations he wants the sun to be shadowed.”
Galileo knew that Aristarchus was the First Heliocentrist
Galileo Galilei, who most certainly had read The Sand Reckoner, and understood its message, did not acknowledge Copernicus as the discoverer of the heliocentric Solar System. Instead, he described him as the ‘restorer and confirmer’ of the hypothesis.
Clearly, Galileo reserved the word ‘discoverer’ for Aristarchus of Samos.
Aristarchus lived for about 80 years. If we could have built on his insights, rather than forgetting about them for so many centuries, think of how much further we might have come in our understanding the Universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment